Berkshire wrote:The "This isn't intermediate" issue has always bugged me. People really need to keep that to themselves, especially if that's all their comment says. The intermediate board is for critique and professional commentary. "This isn't worthy!" is neither of those things. And, unless accompanied by, or better yet, replaced with, suggestions on how to improve, these kinds of comments shouldn't be there, no matter the board they are in.
Personally, I doubt I'll be looking at these new "guidelines" when I draw (well, maybe I will at first, getting used to the new board). I'll just use my own judgement, and trust those around me to do the same.
That's the meaning of "guideline" right?
I definitely see the negative points expressed, and agree with many of them. I for one, will try to look at this as a generally positive change. Personally, I'll be using the boards much the same as I do now, and consider the new "advanced" board more suited to more ridiculously amazing artists like Oofay, for whom the "intermediate" tag is laughable (in my eyes at least)
Well, I'll be giving it a few weeks of watching, this is a new change to our lovely CS, and we'll have to make the best of it. Who really knows how this board will be used in the end?
That's up to us, the users.
The problem I see with this, Berkshire, is that there are only a few Oofays or Panaceas out there. They do photorealism, and they do it well, but that's just one genre of art and I don't see why it should be raised on a pedestal above something that might be equally creative or time-consuming or beautiful, just different. It's a matter of taste in that regard, but this system seems to be encouraging that "Fully realistic is better and because your drawing of a flying monkey from Jupiter happens to be in your own style and doesn't have ideal anatomy, it isn't worthy of this board."
It just comes down so much to a matter of preference and "what do we value more", and I find that impractical. For all the artists that it seems easy to peg as "advanced" there will be plenty for whom that is not the case.